Enduring Guardian and Restrictive Practices: Why Your NSW Document May Need Replacing

Key Points

  • Many older enduring guardian documents don't cover restrictive practices, and NCAT's view is that a guardian needs a specific restrictive practices function to consent.
  • The temporary Commonwealth fallback that lets aged care providers turn to family members is scheduled to end on 1 December 2026.
  • If your document is silent, we recommend a new appointment and a formal revocation of the old one, which you can only do while you have capacity.

If you have appointed an enduring guardian in NSW, you have taken an important step in planning for your future care. However, many enduring guardianship documents, particularly older ones, say nothing about restrictive practices. Aged care homes now routinely raise this when someone moves into care.

If your enduring guardian doesn’t have the power to consent to restrictive practices, your family may need to apply to NCAT at an already difficult time. This article explains what has changed, why it matters, and why we recommend replacing an older document rather than trying to amend it.

What is an enduring guardian?

An enduring guardian is someone you appoint to make personal, lifestyle and health decisions for you if you lose the capacity to make them yourself. Under the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), these decisions can include:

  • where you live;
  • what health care you receive;
  • what other personal services you receive; and
  • whether to consent to medical and dental treatment.

You can also give your enduring guardian other functions relating to your person, and give directions about how their functions are to be used.

Enduring guardianship only takes effect if and when you can no longer make those decisions. Until then, you remain in control.

An enduring guardian is different from an attorney under a power of attorney. An attorney makes financial and legal decisions only. Your enduring guardian makes the personal, lifestyle and health decisions. Most people need both.

What are restrictive practices?

A restrictive practice is any intervention that limits a person’s rights or freedom of movement. In aged care there are five recognised types:

  • Chemical restraint: medication used mainly to influence behaviour rather than to treat a diagnosed illness.
  • Environmental restraint: restricting access to parts of a person’s surroundings, such as a locked memory care unit.
  • Mechanical restraint: using a device, such as a lap belt, to restrict movement.
  • Physical restraint: using physical force to hold or move a person.
  • Seclusion: confining a person alone in a room or area.

A common example is a person living with dementia who is cared for in a secure unit because of the risk of wandering. Another is medication prescribed mainly to manage agitation.

Restrictive practices are meant to be used only as a last resort, in the least restrictive form, and only to prevent harm.

Why restrictive practices now matter for enduring guardianship

Consent is required

Under Commonwealth aged care law, a provider generally needs informed consent before using a restrictive practice, except in an emergency. If the resident can’t consent, a substitute decision-maker must give that consent on their behalf.

NCAT’s approach in NSW

The Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) does not say who can consent to restrictive practices. NCAT has filled that gap. It has consistently taken the view that a guardian can only consent if they hold a specific restrictive practices function. A general power to consent to medical or health care is not enough.

You can give your enduring guardian that function in your appointment. NCAT can also give a guardian the function by order.

The Commonwealth fallback is ending

Until now, a temporary Commonwealth “fallback” list has let aged care providers turn to a nominee, partner, carer or relative where no one else was authorised. That arrangement was originally due to end in 2024. It was extended and is now scheduled to end on 1 December 2026. After that date, families are likely to depend more heavily on whether an enduring guardian holds the right function, or on an NCAT order.

What happens if your enduring guardian doesn't have the restrictive practices function?

If your enduring guardianship document is silent on restrictive practices:

  • Admission can be delayed. An aged care home may hesitate to accept a resident, particularly into a secure dementia unit, without clear authority to consent.
  • Your guardian may be unable to act. Even a trusted family member may not be able to give consent when a decision is needed.
  • An NCAT application may be needed. Your family may have to ask NCAT to make a guardianship order, or to review your appointment and add the function.

Applying to NCAT

NCAT’s Guardianship Division can:

  • review an existing enduring guardian appointment and confirm it with varied functions, including a restrictive practices function; or
  • make a guardianship order appointing a guardian with that function.

An NCAT application is a formal legal process. The Tribunal considers evidence about the person’s capacity and needs before making a decision. It is not a rubber stamp, and it can take time. For families already managing a health crisis or a move into care, this adds stress, delay and cost that could have been avoided.

Why we recommend a new document, not an amendment

If your current enduring guardianship document doesn’t include a restrictive practices function, our practice is to prepare a new Appointment of Enduring Guardian rather than amend the existing one. We then formally revoke the old appointment. A single, current document gives your enduring guardian clear authority. It also avoids uncertainty about which document, or which parts of which document, apply.

Revoking the old appointment properly matters. Under the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), revocation requires a written instrument in the prescribed form, signed while you have capacity and witnessed by an eligible witness, such as a lawyer. Written notice of the revocation must also be given to the enduring guardian you previously appointed.

A statement in your new appointment that earlier appointments are revoked is not, on its own, treated as revoking them. That is why we complete a formal revocation alongside the new appointment.

The key point is timing. You can only make a new appointment and revoke the old one while you still have capacity. Once capacity is lost, the only path is usually through NCAT.

What to consider in your new enduring guardian appointment

When we prepare a new appointment, we talk with you about:

  • The restrictive practices function. This is an express function allowing your enduring guardian to consent to restrictive practices.
  • Directions and limits. For example, that the least restrictive option is always tried first, or that your doctor is consulted before consent is given.
  • Who to appoint. Whether to appoint one enduring guardian or more, and whether to name a substitute in case your first choice can’t act.
  • Your wishes and values. For example, your views on end-of-life care or on medical treatment that conflicts with your beliefs.
  • Your other documents. Your Will, Power of Attorney and enduring guardianship appointment should work together, so we review them as a set.

It is also important to talk with the person you appoint. Your enduring guardian must accept the appointment in writing and should understand your wishes before they ever need to act on them.

Frequently asked questions

Can my enduring guardian consent to restrictive practices under my current document?

Only if your document gives them a specific restrictive practices function. A general health or medical function is unlikely to be enough. If you’re unsure, we can review your document.

Can NCAT give my enduring guardian this power?

Yes. NCAT can review an enduring guardian appointment and vary the guardian’s functions. However, this requires an application, and the Tribunal must be satisfied it is appropriate. It is far simpler to include the function in your appointment while you can.

What if my parent has already lost capacity?

They can no longer sign a new enduring guardianship document. The options are usually an application to NCAT, either to review the existing appointment or for a guardianship order. We can advise on the best approach.

Can someone under an NCAT guardianship order appoint an enduring guardian?

No. If a person is already the subject of a guardianship order, any appointment of an enduring guardian they try to make has no effect. This is another reason to put the right document in place early.

Does my Power of Attorney cover restrictive practices?

No. A Power of Attorney deals with financial and legal decisions only. Consent to restrictive practices is a personal and health decision, so it belongs in an enduring guardian appointment.

Can I just add a clause to my existing document?

We don’t recommend it. Our practice is to prepare a new appointment with the restrictive practices function and formally revoke the old one. This gives your enduring guardian clear, current authority.

How we can help

At Stephen Wawn & Associates, we regularly review and prepare enduring guardianship documents as part of our estate planning work. We can review your existing appointment, prepare a new one with a restrictive practices function, and handle the revocation of your old document. We can also act for families who need to apply to NCAT.

To check whether your enduring guardian can consent to restrictive practices, book a free consultation.

Further information

Related Posts

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you. Or if in hurry, just call us now.

Call : (02) 9328 1000

[email protected] Mon – Fri 09:00-17:00

Contact us now

International Wills in NSW: Overseas Property and Your Will
24 May 2024
Urgent need for provision out of a Deceased Estate | A Guide to Section 62 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
21 May 2024
Arbitration | What is Arbitration and is it right for your matter?
20 February 2024

Disclaimer

No part of these notes can be regarded as legal advice. Although all care has been taken in preparing all notes, readers must not alter their position or refrain from doing so in reliance on any of these notes. Stephen Wawn & Associates do not accept or undertake any duty of care to readers relating to any of these notes. All inquiries should be directed to Stephen Wawn & Associates.